lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACvgo51mRse3su4exyTqXYJRPPc0VqaX9+tRyKUuBPtm5Q+6XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 May 2020 14:28:47 +0100
From:   Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To:     Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Cc:     ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] drm: Add support for the LogiCVC display controller

Hi Paul,

Just had a casual quick look for custom KMS properties, since new
drivers made that mistake in the past.
Thanks for not including any o/

I made a couple of trivial suggestions - if you agree, feel free to
keep them as follow-up patches.

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 20:28, Paul Kocialkowski
<paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com> wrote:

> +int logicvc_of_property_parse_u32(struct device_node *of_node,
> +                                 const char *name, u32 *target)
> +{
> +       struct logicvc_of_property *property;
> +       const char *string;
> +       u32 value;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       property = logicvc_of_property_lookup(name);
> +       if (!property)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
One could have the logicvc_of_properties[] entries indexed with the
logicvc_of_property_parse_{u32,bool} caller, using that instead of the
name string.

Aside: I suspect the array (as most other arrays in this patch) should
be annotated const, correct?


> +       if (property->range[0] || property->range[1])
> +               if (value < property->range[0] || value > property->range[1])
Combine the two ifs?

-Emil

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ