[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfe752dc-6833-2b08-7e7c-6c52ffc81626@web.de>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 18:58:03 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Fix inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR
…
> The proper pointer to be passed as argument is ce.
>
> This bug was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
My software development attention was caught also by your commit message.
…
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ static int __reloc_gpu_alloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>
> ce = intel_context_create(engine);
> if (IS_ERR(ce)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> + err = PTR_ERR(ce);
> goto err_unpin;
> }
>
Are you looking for any more questionable identifier (or expression) combinations
also at other places by the means of advanced source code analysis?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists