[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <906b09e3-edcf-9d0e-e43b-ae77741c55e9@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 19:06:53 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] KVM: X86: Enable fastpath when APICv is enabled
On 30/04/20 15:34, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> static enum exit_fastpath_completion vmx_exit_handlers_fastpath(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> - if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
>> + if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.apicv_active) {
>> switch (to_vmx(vcpu)->exit_reason) {
>> case EXIT_REASON_MSR_WRITE:
>> return handle_fastpath_set_msr_irqoff(vcpu);
> I think that apicv_active checks are specific to APIC MSRs but
> handle_fastpath_set_msr_irqoff() can handle any other MSR as well. I'd
> suggest to move the check inside handle_fastpath_set_msr_irqoff().
>
> Also, enabling Hyper-V SynIC leads to disabling apicv. It it still
> pointless to keep fastpath enabled?
Indeed, only fast paths that only apply to apicv should be disabled (and
ideally there should be a WARN_ON in the code that doesn't support !apicv).
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists