lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200504104917.v6.1.Ic7096b3b9b7828cdd41cd5469a6dee5eb6abf549@changeid>
Date:   Mon,  4 May 2020 10:50:15 -0700
From:   Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     evgreen@...omium.org, swboyd@...omium.org, mka@...omium.org,
        mkshah@...eaurora.org, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/5] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Correctly ignore CPU_CLUSTER_PM notifications

Our switch statement doesn't have entries for CPU_CLUSTER_PM_ENTER,
CPU_CLUSTER_PM_ENTER_FAILED, and CPU_CLUSTER_PM_EXIT and doesn't have
a default.  This means that we'll try to do a flush in those cases but
we won't necessarily be the last CPU down.  That's not so ideal since
our (lack of) locking assumes we're on the last CPU.

Luckily this isn't as big a problem as you'd think since (at least on
the SoC I tested) we don't get these notifications except on full
system suspend.  ...and on full system suspend we get them on the last
CPU down.  That means that the worst problem we hit is flushing twice.
Still, it's good to make it correct.

Fixes: 985427f997b6 ("soc: qcom: rpmh: Invoke rpmh_flush() for dirty caches")
Reported-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---

Changes in v6:
- Release the lock on cluster notifications.

Changes in v5:
- Corrently => Correctly

Changes in v4:
- ("...Corrently ignore CPU_CLUSTER_PM notifications") split out for v4.

Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2: None

 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
index a9e15699f55f..8c338335fc21 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -806,6 +806,9 @@ static int rpmh_rsc_cpu_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 	case CPU_PM_EXIT:
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &drv->cpus_entered_pm);
 		goto exit;
+	default:
+		ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
+		goto exit;
 	}
 
 	ret = rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_busy(drv);
-- 
2.26.2.526.g744177e7f7-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ