linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm/arm64: smccc: Add ARCH_SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 18:59:01 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, harb@...erecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm/arm64: smccc: Add ARCH_SOC_ID support

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:20:50PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:29:05AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/soc_id.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/soc_id.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b45f2d78e12e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/soc_id.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2020 Arm Limited
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> > +
> > +#define SMCCC_SOC_ID_JEP106_BANK_IDX_MASK	GENMASK(30, 24)
> > +/*
> > + * As per the spec bits[23:16] are JEP-106 identification code with parity bit
> > + * for the SiP. We can drop the parity bit.
> > + */
> 
> Which spec? Could you link to the doc and section here, please?
> 

Sure, sorry since I updated the link in 1/5, I forgot all of it and just
started referring it here.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep