lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 10:51:22 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kishon@...com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
        robh@...nel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, chuanhua.lei@...ux.intel.com,
        qi-ming.wu@...el.com, yixin.zhu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] phy: intel: Add driver support for ComboPhy

On 04-05-20, 17:32, Dilip Kota wrote:
> 
> On 5/4/2020 5:20 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 04-05-20, 16:26, Dilip Kota wrote:
> > > On 5/4/2020 3:29 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > On 30-04-20, 15:15, Dilip Kota wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > +					  u32 mask, u32 val)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	u32 reg_val;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	reg_val = readl(base + reg);
> > > > > +	reg_val &= ~mask;
> > > > > +	reg_val |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val);
> > > > > +	writel(reg_val, base + reg);
> > > > bypassing regmap here... why?
> > > It is not regmap address, one of the below two addresses are passed to this
> > > function.
> > okay, perhaps add a comment somewhere that regmap is not used for this
> > base?
> I dont see a need of adding a comment, describing don't do regmap here.

Driver uses regmap except here, which seems odd hence explanation
required for this.

> > 
> > > struct intel_combo_phy {
> > > ...
> > >          void __iomem            *app_base;
> > >          void __iomem            *cr_base;
> > > ...
> > > }
> > 
> > > > > +static int intel_cbphy_calibrate(struct phy *phy)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	struct intel_cbphy_iphy *iphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > > > > +	struct intel_combo_phy *cbphy = iphy->parent;
> > > > > +	void __iomem *cr_base = cbphy->cr_base;
> > > > > +	int val, ret, id;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (cbphy->phy_mode != PHY_XPCS_MODE)
> > > > > +		return 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	id = PHY_ID(iphy);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	/* trigger auto RX adaptation */
> > > > > +	combo_phy_w32_off_mask(cr_base, CR_ADDR(PCS_XF_ATE_OVRD_IN_2, id),
> > > > > +			       ADAPT_REQ_MSK, 3);
> > > > > +	/* Wait RX adaptation to finish */
> > > > > +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(cr_base + CR_ADDR(PCS_XF_RX_ADAPT_ACK, id),
> > > > > +				 val, val & RX_ADAPT_ACK_BIT, 10, 5000);
> > > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > > +		dev_err(cbphy->dev, "RX Adaptation failed!\n");
> > > > you want to continue her and not return error?
> > > Next step is stopping the Adaptation, it should be done in both error and
> > > success case.
> > Again documenting this helps, pls add some comments on this behaviour
> Comments are already in place, mentioning Start and Stop of Rx Adaptation.
> And Stop is being is done as Start is triggered, so not needed to mention
> error and success.

Ok

-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ