[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 21:34:46 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove set_fs calls from the coredump code v6
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series gets rid of playing with the address limit in the exec and
> coredump code. Most of this was fairly trivial, the biggest changes are
> those to the spufs coredump code.
>
> Changes since v5:
> - fix uaccess under spinlock in spufs (Jeremy)
> - remove use of access_ok in spufs
>
> Changes since v4:
> - change some goto names as suggested by Linus
>
> Changes since v3:
> - fix x86 compilation with x32 in the new version of the signal code
> - split the exec patches into a new series
>
> Changes since v2:
> - don't cleanup the compat siginfo calling conventions, use the patch
> variant from Eric with slight coding style fixes instead.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - properly spell NUL
> - properly handle the compat siginfo case in ELF coredumps
Looks good. Want me to put it into vfs.git? #work.set_fs-exec, perhaps?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists