lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 05 May 2020 19:44:01 -0300
From:   Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com,
        pmorel@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        brendanhiggins@...gle.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: s390: Fix wrong label Guest2 instead of Guest3

On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 09:46 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 19:12:38 -0300
> Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org> wrote:
> 
> > This fixes:
> > 
> > Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.rst:488: WARNING: duplicate label
> > s390/vfio-ap:guest2, other instance in
> > /home/iha/sdb/opensource/lkmp/linux_doc/Documentation/s390/vfio-
> > ap.rst
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.rst | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.rst
> > b/Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.rst
> > index b5c51f7c748d..367e27ec3c50 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.rst
> > @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ CARD.DOMAIN TYPE  MODE
> >  05.00ff     CEX5A Accelerator
> >  =========== ===== ============
> >  
> > -Guest2
> > +Guest3
> >  ------
> >  =========== ===== ============
> >  CARD.DOMAIN TYPE  MODE
> 
> Applied, thanks.
> 
> Note, though, that while the patch does "fix" the warning, what it
> really
> fixes is (as suggested in the subject) an incorrect heading; the
> warning
> was just a symptom.

Thanks Jon, I will be careful about that.
> 
> jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists