[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 08:30:46 +0900
From: "Hyunki Koo" <hyunki00.koo@...sung.com>
To: "'Greg Kroah-Hartman'" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "'Kukjin Kim'" <kgene@...nel.org>,
"'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzk@...nel.org>,
"'Jiri Slaby'" <jslaby@...e.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/3] serial: samsung: Replace rd_regb/wr_regb with
rd_reg/wr_reg
On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 2020 11:23:00 PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:32:56AM +0900, Hyunki Koo wrote:
> > This patch change the name of macro for general usage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@...sung.com>
>
> This patch series creates the following build error, which is not
> allowed:
>
> CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.o
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c:186:13: warning: ‘wr_reg_barrier’
> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 186 | static void wr_reg_barrier(struct uart_port *port, u32 reg, u32 val)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Please fix up and resend. Always make sure you keep the reviewed-by
> tags from others as well.
>
> greg k-h
I tested on latest kernel today one more time, there is no error and warning on my side, not only patch 1/3 and patch 3/3
Line 1735: CC drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.o
Line 343: CC drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.o
wr_reg_barrier is not defined in patch 1/3,
and wr_reg_barrier is define and used in patch3/3
it might be no warning.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists