lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 16:36:49 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        George Burgess <gbiv@...gle.com>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: disable FORTIFY_SOURCE on clang-10

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:22 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:19 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > (Though as was mentioned, it's likely that FORTIFY_SOURCE isn't working
> > _at all_ under Clang, so I may still send a patch to depend on !clang
> > just to avoid surprises until it's fixed, but I haven't had time to
> > chase down a solution yet.)

Not good.  If it's completely broken, turn it off, and we'll prioritize fixing.

> That might be the most coherent thing to do, at least so that people
> don't get some false sense of mitigation.

Do we have a better test for "this is working as intended" or not
other than excessive stack usage, since that doesn't repro for
clang-9?
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists