lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 12:22:34 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <>
        Christoph Hellwig <>,
        Robin Murphy <>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <>,,
        David Airlie <>,
        Daniel Vetter <>, Joerg Roedel <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/25] dma-mapping: add generic helpers for mapping
 sgtable objects

> +static inline int dma_map_sgtable_attrs(struct device *dev,
> +	struct sg_table *sgt, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)

Two tab indents for parameter continuation, please.

Can we also skip the separate _attrs version?  The existing ones have the
separate _attrs variant as there were pre-existing versions without the
attrs argument and lots of users, but that doesn't really apply here as
an extra 0 argument isn't really an issue.

> +static inline size_t iommu_map_sgtable(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +			unsigned long iova, struct sg_table *sgt, int prot)
> +{
> +	return iommu_map_sg(domain, iova, sgt->sgl, sgt->orig_nents, prot);
> +}

Should this be a separate patch due to the different subsystems?

FYI, I'll happily pick up the prep patches in an immutable branch of
the dma-mapping tree one we have settled on the details.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists