linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] drm: core: fix common struct sg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 13:09:50 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] drm: core: fix common struct sg_table related
 issues

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:51:58PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On 05.05.2020 12:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> -		for_each_sg_page(st->sgl, &sg_iter, st->nents, 0)
> >> +		for_each_sg_page(st->sgl, &sg_iter, st->orig_nents, 0)
> > Would it make sense to also add a for_each_sgtable_page helper that
> > hides the use of orig_nents?  To be used like:
> >
> > 		for_each_sgtable_page(st, &sg_iter, 0) {
> 
> We would need two helpers:
> 
> for_each_sgtable_cpu_page() and for_each_sgtable_dma_page().
> 
> I considered them, but then I found that there are already 
> for_each_sg_page(), for_each_sg_dma_page() and various special iterators 
> like sg_page_iter, sg_dma_page_iter and sg_mapping_iter. Too bad that 
> they are almost not used, at least in the DRM subsystem. I wonder if it 
> make sense to apply them or simply provide the two above mentioned 
> wrappers?

None of the helpers helps with passing the right parameters from the
sg_table.  So in doube we'd need wrappers for all of the above, or
none..