lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 4 May 2020 22:15:14 -0400
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <>
To:     Tejun Heo <>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <>,
        "open list:NFS, SUNRPC, AND..." <>,
        Jeff Layton <>,
        David Howells <>, Shaohua Li <>,
        Oleg Nesterov <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] allow multiple kthreadd's

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 02:21:54PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:59:24AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Which kind of makes me want to point a finger at Tejun. But it's been
> > mostly PeterZ touching this file lately..
> Looks fine to me too. I don't quite understand the usecase tho. It looks
> like all it's being used for is to tag some kthreads as belonging to the
> same group. Can't that be done with kthread_data()?

Yeah, so I'd forgotten about kthread->data.

We're currently using it to pass the struct svc_rqst that a new nfsd
thread needs.  But once the new thread has gotten that, I guess it could
set kthread->data to some global value that it uses to say "I'm a knfsd

I suppose that would work.

Though now I'm feeling greedy: it would be nice to have both some kind
of global flag, *and* keep kthread->data pointing to svc_rqst (as that
would give me a simpler and quicker way to figure out which client is
conflicting).  Could I take a flag bit in kthread->flags, maybe?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists