linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: remove ioctl_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 14:44:23 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: remove ioctl_by_bdev from DASD driver

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:45:33AM +0200, Stefan Haberland wrote:
> > findthe corresponding device for example. Not sure if this is that easy.
> 
> I did some additional research on this.
> What I could imagine:
> 
> The gendisk->private_data pointer currently contains a pointer to
> the dasd_devmap structure. This one is also reachable by iterating
> over an exported dasd_hashlist.
> So I could export the dasd_hashlist symbol, iterate over it and try
> to find the dasd_devmap pointer I have from the gendisk->private_data
> pointer.
> This would ensure that the gendisk belongs to the DASD driver and I
> could use the additional information that is somehow reachable through
> the gendisk->private_data pointer.
> 
> But again, I am not sure if this additional code and effort is needed.
> From my point of view checking the gendisk->major for DASD_MAJOR is
> OK to ensure that the device belongs to the DASD driver.

With CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT you can't rely on major numbers.

And compared to all the complications I think the biodasdinfo method
is the least of all those evils.  Jens, any opinion?