lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 09:20:51 -0400
From:   Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: compaction: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zone_spans_pfn(page_zone(page), pfn))



> On May 5, 2020, at 8:43 AM, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 04/24/20 at 09:45am, Qian Cai wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 23, 2020, at 11:43 PM, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 04/23/20 at 05:25pm, Qian Cai wrote:
>>>> Compaction starts to crash below on linux-next today. The faulty page belongs to Node 0 DMA32 zone.
>>>> I’ll continue to narrow it down, but just want to give a headup in case someone could beat me to it.
>>>> 
>>>> Debug output from free_area_init_core()
>>>> [    0.000000] KK start page = ffffea0000000040, end page = ffffea0000040000, nid = 0 DMA
>>>> [    0.000000] KK start page = ffffea0000040000, end page = ffffea0004000000, nid = 0 DMA32
>>>> [    0.000000] KK start page = ffffea0004000000, end page = ffffea0012000000, nid = 0 NORMAL
>>>> [    0.000000] KK start page = ffffea0012000000, end page = ffffea0021fc0000, nid = 4 NORMAL
>>> 
>>> Where are these printed? They are the direct mapping address of page?
>> 
>> From this debug patch. Yes, direct mapping.
> 
> Can you try below patch? I may get why this is caused, not sure if the
> place is right. 
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 177c11a8f3b9..e26972f26414 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -1409,7 +1409,9 @@ fast_isolate_freepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> 				cc->free_pfn = highest;
> 			} else {
> 				if (cc->direct_compaction && pfn_valid(min_pfn)) {
> -					page = pfn_to_page(min_pfn);
> +					page = pageblock_pfn_to_page(min_pfn,
> +						pageblock_end_pfn(min_pfn),
> +						cc->zone);
> 					cc->free_pfn = min_pfn;
> 				}
> 			}

I have not had luck to reproduce this again yet, but feel free to move forward with the patch anyway if you are comfortable to do so, so at least people could review it properly.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists