linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 08/20] mips: Fix cpu_has_mips64r1/2 activation for MIPS32 CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200506174238.15385-9-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Date:   Wed, 6 May 2020 20:42:26 +0300
From:   <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
CC:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@...at.org>,
        <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/20] mips: Fix cpu_has_mips64r1/2 activation for MIPS32 CPUs

From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>

Commit 1aeba347b3a9 ("MIPS: Hardcode cpu_has_mips* where target ISA
allows") updated the cpu_has_mips* macro to be replaced with a constant
expression where it's possible. By mistake it wasn't done correctly
for cpu_has_mips64r1/cpu_has_mips64r2 macro. They are defined to
be replaced with conditional expression __isa_range_or_flag(), which
means either ISA revision being within the range or the corresponding
CPU options flag was set at the probe stage or both being true at the
same time. But the ISA level value doesn't indicate whether the ISA is
MIPS32 or MIPS64. Due to this if we select MIPS32r1 - MIPS32r5
architectures the __isa_range() macro will activate the
cpu_has_mips64rX flags, which is incorrect. In order to fix the
problem we added a new macro __isa_range_and_flag() and use it to
define the cpu_has_mips64r1/cpu_has_mips64r2 flags.

Fixes: 1aeba347b3a9 ("MIPS: Hardcode cpu_has_mips* where target ISA allows")
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
---
 arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h
index e2f31bd6363b..7e22b9c1e279 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@
 	((MIPS_ISA_REV >= (ge)) && (MIPS_ISA_REV < (lt)))
 #define __isa_range_or_flag(ge, lt, flag) \
 	(__isa_range(ge, lt) || ((MIPS_ISA_REV < (lt)) && __isa(flag)))
+#define __isa_range_and_flag(ge, lt, flag) \
+	(__isa_range(ge, lt) && __isa(flag))
 
 /*
  * SMP assumption: Options of CPU 0 are a superset of all processors.
@@ -291,10 +293,10 @@
 # define cpu_has_mips32r6	__isa_ge_or_flag(6, MIPS_CPU_ISA_M32R6)
 #endif
 #ifndef cpu_has_mips64r1
-# define cpu_has_mips64r1	__isa_range_or_flag(1, 6, MIPS_CPU_ISA_M64R1)
+# define cpu_has_mips64r1	__isa_range_and_flag(1, 6, MIPS_CPU_ISA_M64R1)
 #endif
 #ifndef cpu_has_mips64r2
-# define cpu_has_mips64r2	__isa_range_or_flag(2, 6, MIPS_CPU_ISA_M64R2)
+# define cpu_has_mips64r2	__isa_range_and_flag(2, 6, MIPS_CPU_ISA_M64R2)
 #endif
 #ifndef cpu_has_mips64r6
 # define cpu_has_mips64r6	__isa_ge_and_flag(6, MIPS_CPU_ISA_M64R6)
-- 
2.25.1