[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200506202514.GF1084880@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 13:25:14 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 05/11] {x86,powerpc,microblaze}/kmap: Move preempt
disable
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:11:13PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 06:09:06PM -0700, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> >
> > During this kmap() conversion series we must maintain bisect-ability.
> > To do this, kmap_atomic_prot() in x86, powerpc, and microblaze need to
> > remain functional.
> >
> > Create a temporary inline version of kmap_atomic_prot within these
> > architectures so we can rework their kmap_atomic() calls and then lift
> > kmap_atomic_prot() to the core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes from V1:
> > New patch
> > ---
> > arch/microblaze/include/asm/highmem.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> > arch/microblaze/mm/highmem.c | 10 ++--------
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/highmem.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> > arch/powerpc/mm/highmem.c | 9 ++-------
> > arch/x86/include/asm/highmem.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> > arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c | 10 ++--------
> > 6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/highmem.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/highmem.h
> > index 0c94046f2d58..ec9954b091e1 100644
> > --- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/highmem.h
> > +++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/highmem.h
> > @@ -51,7 +51,16 @@ extern pte_t *pkmap_page_table;
> > #define PKMAP_NR(virt) ((virt - PKMAP_BASE) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> > #define PKMAP_ADDR(nr) (PKMAP_BASE + ((nr) << PAGE_SHIFT))
> >
> > -extern void *kmap_atomic_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot);
> > +extern void *kmap_atomic_high_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot);
> > +void *kmap_atomic_prot(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
>
> Shouldn't this be marked inline?
Yes Thanks. Done.
>
> The rest looks fine:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Thanks,
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists