[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200506124902.GA20867@lsv03152.swis.in-blr01.nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 18:19:02 +0530
From: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux.cj@...il.com,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Makarand Pawagi <makarand.pawagi@....com>,
"Rajesh V . Bikkina" <rajesh.bikkina@....com>,
Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce new APIs to support phylink
and phy layers
Hi Rafael,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:26:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 7:38 AM Calvin Johnson
> <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote:
> >
<snip>
> > > So, yes, there's another driver using it, but the ACPI folk probably
> > > never got a look-in on that instance. Even if they had been copied,
> > > the patch description is probably sufficiently poor that they wouldn't
> > > have read the patch.
> > >
> > > I'd say there's questions over whether ACPI people will find this an
> > > acceptable approach.
> > >
> > > Given that your patch moves this from one driver to a subsystem thing,
> > > it needs to be ratified by ACPI people, because it's effectively
> > > becoming a standardised way to represent a PHY in ACPI.
> >
> > How can we get attention/response from ACPI people?
>
> This is in my queue, but the processing of this has been slow for a
> while, sorry about that.
>
> If you have a new version of the series, please submit it, otherwise
> ping me in a couple of days if I don't respond to the patches in the
> meantime.
I've posted v3 of the patchset. Can you please review?
Thanks
Calvin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists