[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdasEU0ao0OZBoeQ9x5Efe8tFwtpkLMOU_=Xn639anJxbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 14:51:04 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] iio: accel: bma180: Add support for bma023
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:22 PM Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca> wrote:
> The bma023 chip is similar enough to the bma180 and bma25x that the
> same driver can support all of them. The biggest differences are
> the lack of a temperature channel and no low power but still working
> mode.
>
> The bma150 is a close relative of the bma023, but it does have a
> temperature channel so support is not added for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
Looks good to me!
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists