linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] btrfs: Remove unused inline function heads_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200506132239.3252-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 May 2020 21:22:39 +0800
From:   YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To:     <clm@...com>, <josef@...icpanda.com>, <dsterba@...e.com>
CC:     <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] btrfs: Remove unused inline function heads_to_leaves

There's no callers in-tree anymore since commit 64403612b73a ("btrfs:
rework btrfs_check_space_for_delayed_refs")

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index faa585d54eb7..3593f8cce9e5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -2114,22 +2114,6 @@ static u64 find_middle(struct rb_root *root)
 }
 #endif
 
-static inline u64 heads_to_leaves(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 heads)
-{
-	u64 num_bytes;
-
-	num_bytes = heads * (sizeof(struct btrfs_extent_item) +
-			     sizeof(struct btrfs_extent_inline_ref));
-	if (!btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SKINNY_METADATA))
-		num_bytes += heads * sizeof(struct btrfs_tree_block_info);
-
-	/*
-	 * We don't ever fill up leaves all the way so multiply by 2 just to be
-	 * closer to what we're really going to want to use.
-	 */
-	return div_u64(num_bytes, BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(fs_info));
-}
-
 /*
  * Takes the number of bytes to be csumm'ed and figures out how many leaves it
  * would require to store the csums for that many bytes.
-- 
2.17.1