[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482526608.2543.1588773672085.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 10:01:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: ndesaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
bristot <bristot@...hat.com>, jbaron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/18] static_call: Add static_cond_call()
----- On May 6, 2020, at 9:55 AM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 04:27:44PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Actually, if the goal is to do code patching of the call, I wonder
>> what makes it OK to "guess" all the call patterns generated by the compiler ?
>
> We're not guessing, have have objtool read the compiler output and
> record the location for us. The compiler can generate whatever it likes.
So is the plan to adapt objtool if future compilers change the generated
instruction patterns ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists