[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eae29941-683c-4501-d3f0-8c33532e8975@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 12:19:33 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Fix some typo errors in ras.rst
On 5/5/20 11:48 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:10:49AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Fix typo errors.
> By reformatting it, you've successfully obscured what typos you've fixed.
> As a result I read the whole paragraph, and ...
>
>> ECC memory
>> ----------
>>
>> -As mentioned on the previous section, ECC memory has extra bits to be
>> -used for error correction. So, on 64 bit systems, a memory module
>> -has 64 bits of *data width*, and 74 bits of *total width*. So, there are
>> -8 bits extra bits to be used for the error detection and correction
>> +As mentioned on the previous section, ECC memory has extra bits to
> s/on/in/
>
>> +be used for error correction. So, on 64 bit systems, a memory module
>> +has 64 bits of *data width*, and 72 bits of *total width*.
> Usually a 64-bit system refers to the width of a pointer. Here, it's
> referring to the width of the memory system, which is rather confusing.
> How about "In the above example" instead of "So, on 64 bit systems".
>
>> So, there
>> +are 8 extra bits to be used for the error detection and correction
>> mechanisms. Those extra bits are called *syndrome*\ [#f1]_\ [#f2]_.
> This would read better as:
>
> The extra 8 bits which are used for error detection and correction
> are referred to as the *syndrome*\ [#f1]_\ [#f2]_.
>
Thanks for the suggestion. Will incorporate that in v2.
-Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists