linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] perf stat: Fix wrong per-thread runtime stat for interval mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200507151919.GE2804092@krava>
Date:   Thu, 7 May 2020 17:19:19 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] perf stat: Fix wrong per-thread runtime stat for
 interval mode

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:58:19PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:

SNIP

> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index e0c1ad23c768..97ee941649e6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -351,6 +351,16 @@ static void read_counters(struct timespec *rs)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void thread_stats_reset(struct perf_stat_config *config)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (config->stats) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < config->stats_num; i++)
> +			perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&config->stats[i]);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void process_interval(void)
>  {
>  	struct timespec ts, rs;
> @@ -359,6 +369,7 @@ static void process_interval(void)
>  	diff_timespec(&rs, &ts, &ref_time);
>  
>  	perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&rt_stat);
> +	thread_stats_reset(&stat_config);

can't you call in here perf_stat__reset_stats?

and if not, I know it's threads related, but new
and delete functions are:

  runtime_stat_new, runtime_stat_delete

so let's call it runtime_stat_reset and place it next to
the new/delete functions

other than that it looks ok, thanks

jirka

>  	read_counters(&rs);
>  
>  	if (STAT_RECORD) {
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>