[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10918cd1-a4a9-7872-9672-efcd28ef0751@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 17:22:28 +0200
From: Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: remove ioctl_by_bdev from DASD driver
Am 06.05.20 um 06:52 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>
> No, I mean the series that I actually sent out:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/21/66
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/21/68
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/21/69
OK, just thought again about your suggestion and also that
you have already been talking about a symbol lookup I just
have written a prototype that took your first two patches
as base, exports the symbol of dasd_biodasdinfo and in
ibm.c I do a kallsyms_lookup_name("dasd_biodasdinfo").
So I would not have to define a structure twice or rely on
MAJORs. Also we would not have to define an own file
operation only for DASD devices.
What do you think about this? If you agree I will polish
the patches, test them and send them for review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists