linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: remove ioctl_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 May 2020 17:22:28 +0200
From:   Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: remove ioctl_by_bdev from DASD driver

Am 06.05.20 um 06:52 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>
> No, I mean the series that I actually sent out:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/21/66
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/21/68
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/21/69

OK, just thought again about your suggestion and also that
you have already been talking about a symbol lookup I just
have written a prototype that took your first two patches
as base, exports the symbol of dasd_biodasdinfo and in
ibm.c I do a kallsyms_lookup_name("dasd_biodasdinfo").

So I would not have to define a structure twice or rely on
MAJORs. Also we would not have to define an own file
operation only for DASD devices.

What do you think about this? If you agree I will polish
the patches, test them and send them for review.