[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200507161424.2584-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 16:14:24 +0000
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: cl@...ux.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: arnd@...db.de, willy@...radead.org, aquini@...hat.com,
keescook@...omium.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: expand documentation over __read_mostly
__read_mostly can easily be misused by folks, its not meant for
just read-only data. There are performance reasons for using it, but
we also don't provide any guidance about its use. Provide a bit more
guidance over its use.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
---
This v2 just has a few spelling fixes.
include/linux/cache.h | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cache.h b/include/linux/cache.h
index 750621e41d1c..8106fb304fa7 100644
--- a/include/linux/cache.h
+++ b/include/linux/cache.h
@@ -15,8 +15,14 @@
/*
* __read_mostly is used to keep rarely changing variables out of frequently
- * updated cachelines. If an architecture doesn't support it, ignore the
- * hint.
+ * updated cachelines. Its use should be reserved for data that is used
+ * frequently in hot paths. Performance traces can help decide when to use
+ * this. You want __read_mostly data to be tightly packed, so that in the
+ * best case multiple frequently read variables for a hot path will be next
+ * to each other in order to reduce the number of cachelines needed to
+ * execute a critical path. We should be mindful and selective of its use.
+ * ie: if you're going to use it please supply a *good* justification in your
+ * commit log
*/
#ifndef __read_mostly
#define __read_mostly
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists