[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202005071056.F83305E0@keescook>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 10:56:22 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...gle.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the chrome-platform tree with the
pstore tree
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:55:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the chrome-platform tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_pstore.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 7bddec15c574 ("pstore/ram: Introduce max_reason and convert dump_oops")
>
> from the pstore tree and commit:
>
> 1c7c51347f2e ("platform/chrome: chromeos_pstore: set user space log size")
>
> from the chrome-platform tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_pstore.c
> index fa51153688b4,82dea8cb5da1..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_pstore.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_pstore.c
> @@@ -57,7 -57,8 +57,8 @@@ static struct ramoops_platform_data chr
> .record_size = 0x40000,
> .console_size = 0x20000,
> .ftrace_size = 0x20000,
> + .pmsg_size = 0x20000,
> - .dump_oops = 1,
> + .max_reason = KMSG_DUMP_OOPS,
> };
>
> static struct platform_device chromeos_ramoops = {
Thanks! Yes, that looks correct.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists