linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] pstore/ram: Refactor DT size parsing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202005071103.EDD880257@keescook>
Date:   Thu, 7 May 2020 11:04:32 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc:     Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] pstore/ram: Refactor DT size parsing

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:57:50AM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:15 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Refactor device tree size parsing routines to be able to pass a non-zero
> > default value for providing a configurable default for the coming
> > "max_reason" field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 
> ramoops_parse_dt_size
> parse_size
> 
> Are used to parse flags, and max-reason properties, so the "size" in
> their names become outdated. How about:
> ramoops_parse_dt_prop
> parse_prop

Yeah, I struggled with that thought too.

> Otherwise it looks good.

Okay, great, I'll find a better name and apply this series. Thanks!

-- 
Kees Cook