[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=a3MR7osKBpbq=d41ieo7G9FtOp5Kok5por1P5ZS9s4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 12:19:30 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"kernelci . org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@...il.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: bitops: fix build regression
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 7:00 AM Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This change will make sparse happy and allow these cleanups:
> #define CONST_MASK(nr) ((u8)1 << ((nr) & 7))
yep, this is more elegant, IMO. Will send a v3 later with this
change. Looking at the uses of CONST_MASK, I noticed
arch_change_bit() currently has the (u8) cast from commit
838e8bb71dc0c ("x86: Implement change_bit with immediate operand as
"lock xorb""), so that instance can get cleaned up with the above
suggestion.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists