[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200507203612.GF19331@lorien.usersys.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 16:36:12 -0400
From: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more
sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more
The recent patch, fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning)
did not fully resolve the issues with the rq->tmp_alone_branch !=
&rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list warning in enqueue_task_fair. There is a case where
the first for_each_sched_entity loop exits due to on_rq, having incompletely
updated the list. In this case the second for_each_sched_entity loop can
further modify se. The later code to fix up the list management fails to do
what is needed because se no longer points to the sched_entity which broke
out of the first loop.
Address this by calling leaf_add_rq_list if there are throttled parents while
doing the second for_each_sched_entity loop.
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 02f323b85b6d..c6d57c334d51 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5479,6 +5479,13 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
/* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
goto enqueue_throttle;
+
+ /*
+ * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the
+ * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list.
+ */
+ if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
+ list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
}
enqueue_throttle:
--
2.18.0
V2 rework the fix based on Vincent's suggestion. Thanks Vincent.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists