[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200507222856.GB81857@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 15:28:56 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: consistent update to pgsteal and pgscan
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 01:49:13PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> One way to measure the efficiency of memory reclaim is to look at the
> ratio (pgscan+pfrefill)/pgsteal. However at the moment these stats are
> not updated consistently at the system level and the ratio of these are
> not very meaningful. The pgsteal and pgscan are updated for only global
> reclaim while pgrefill gets updated for global as well as cgroup
> reclaim.
>
> Please note that this difference is only for system level vmstats. The
> cgroup stats returned by memory.stat are actually consistent. The
> cgroup's pgsteal contains number of reclaimed pages for global as well
> as cgroup reclaim. So, one way to get the system level stats is to get
> these stats from root's memory.stat but root does not expose that
> interface. Also for !CONFIG_MEMCG machines /proc/vmstat is the only way
> to get these stats. So, make these stats consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists