[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200507164614.4a816d2aa1b341be937b128a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 16:46:14 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tan Hu <tan.hu@....com.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xue.zhihong@....com.cn,
wang.yi59@....com.cn, wang.liang82@....com.cn,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/flex_proportions.c: aging counts when fraction
smaller than max_frac/FPROP_FRAC_BASE
On Wed, 6 May 2020 14:21:28 +0800 Tan Hu <tan.hu@....com.cn> wrote:
> If the given type has fraction smaller than max_frac/FPROP_FRAC_BASE,
> __fprop_inc_percpu_max should follow the design formula and aging
> fraction too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tan Hu <tan.hu@....com.cn>
> ---
> lib/flex_proportions.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/flex_proportions.c b/lib/flex_proportions.c
> index 7852bfff5..451543937 100644
> --- a/lib/flex_proportions.c
> +++ b/lib/flex_proportions.c
> @@ -266,8 +266,7 @@ void __fprop_inc_percpu_max(struct fprop_global *p,
> if (numerator >
> (((u64)denominator) * max_frac) >> FPROP_FRAC_SHIFT)
> return;
> - } else
> - fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl);
> - percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
> - percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1);
> + }
> +
> + __fprop_inc_percpu(p, pl);
> }
(Cc Jan)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists