[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <777550697e44478c46768db5265dcdda094932f4.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 23:55:30 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: christian.koenig@....com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
"David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@....com>,
John Clements <john.clements@....com>
Cc: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@....com>, Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Dennis Li <Dennis.Li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: allocate large structures dynamically
On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 08:42 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 06.05.20 um 21:01 schrieb Joe Perches:
[]
> > And trivia:
> >
> > The !! uses with bool seem unnecessary and it's probably better
> > to make amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled to return bool.
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
[]
> > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static int __amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> > */
> > if (!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head))
> > return 0;
> > - if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
> > + if (!(enable ^ amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
>
> And while we are at improving coding style I think that writing this as
> "if (enabled == amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))" would be
> much more readable.
<blink, chuckle> that's decidedly true...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists