[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <940d5632-825b-510e-bc4d-1e8de22ccd60@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 18:23:00 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] MIPS: Loongson: Add DMA support for LS7A
On 05/07/2020 09:41 AM, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Christoph,
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:44 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:47:30PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>>> For the above reasons, I think what you are concerned is not a
>>>> big deal.
>>> I don't think so, this is obviously a regression. If we can accept a
>>> regression of RS780E, why we still maintain Loongson-2EF rather than
>>> simply drop them?
>> While I much prefer to use the default, regression an otherwise
>> working platform seems like a bad idea. I don't really know much
>> about the Loongson platforms, do they all boot using the same kernel
>> image?
> All Loongson-3 machines (with LS7A bridge or RS780 bridge) use the
> same kernel image.
Hi Christoph, Huacai and Jiaxun,
Thank you very much for your reviews and discussions.
If you agree to use the platform dependent implementation
of __phys_to_dma() and __dma_to_phys(), I will make a slight
modification based on the v4 patch [1] to put ls7a things
before rs780e things, and then send v7 as soon as possible.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1220010/
Thanks,
Tiezhu Yang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists