[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJW4qZ_Wnp_oRa=j=YnvTzVa3HZ13Hgwy71jS6L3Bd3oMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 12:50:15 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: "Mark-MC.Lee" <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] net: ethernet: mtk-eth-mac: new driver
czw., 7 maj 2020 o 11:46 Mark-MC.Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com> napisaĆ(a):
>
> Hi Bartosz:
> I think the naming of this driver and its Kconfig option is too generic
> that will confuse with current mediatek SoCs eth driver architecture(for
> all mt7xxx SoCs).
> Since mtk_eth_mac.c is not a common MAC part for all mediatek SoC but
> only a specific eth driver for mt85xx, it will be more reasonable to
> name it as mt85xx_eth.c and change NET_MEDIATEK_MAC to
> NET_MEDIATEK_MT85XX. How do you think?
>
Hi Mark,
I actually consulted this with MediaTek and the name is their idea.
Many drivers in drivers/net/ethernet have very vague names. I guess
this isn't a problem.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists