[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158894309660.8414.744004103071020836.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 13:04:56 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Adrian Hunter" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: perf/core] perf intel-pt: Update documentation about using /proc/kcore
The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 6dd912cbadb9f9746a525c74f09c0e36cee13ee2
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/6dd912cbadb9f9746a525c74f09c0e36cee13ee2
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:07:51 +03:00
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitterDate: Tue, 05 May 2020 16:35:30 -03:00
perf intel-pt: Update documentation about using /proc/kcore
Update documentation to reflect the advent of the --kcore option for
'perf record'.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200429150751.12570-10-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-intel-pt.txt | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-intel-pt.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-intel-pt.txt
index 782eb8a..eb8b7d4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-intel-pt.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-intel-pt.txt
@@ -69,22 +69,22 @@ And profiled with 'perf report' e.g.
To also trace kernel space presents a problem, namely kernel self-modifying
code. A fairly good kernel image is available in /proc/kcore but to get an
accurate image a copy of /proc/kcore needs to be made under the same conditions
-as the data capture. A script perf-with-kcore can do that, but beware that the
-script makes use of 'sudo' to copy /proc/kcore. If you have perf installed
-locally from the source tree you can do:
+as the data capture. 'perf record' can make a copy of /proc/kcore if the option
+--kcore is used, but access to /proc/kcore is restricted e.g.
- ~/libexec/perf-core/perf-with-kcore record pt_ls -e intel_pt// -- ls
+ sudo perf record -o pt_ls --kcore -e intel_pt// -- ls
-which will create a directory named 'pt_ls' and put the perf.data file and
-copies of /proc/kcore, /proc/kallsyms and /proc/modules into it. Then to use
-'perf report' becomes:
+which will create a directory named 'pt_ls' and put the perf.data file (named
+simply 'data') and copies of /proc/kcore, /proc/kallsyms and /proc/modules into
+it. The other tools understand the directory format, so to use 'perf report'
+becomes:
- ~/libexec/perf-core/perf-with-kcore report pt_ls
+ sudo perf report -i pt_ls
Because samples are synthesized after-the-fact, the sampling period can be
selected for reporting. e.g. sample every microsecond
- ~/libexec/perf-core/perf-with-kcore report pt_ls --itrace=i1usge
+ sudo perf report pt_ls --itrace=i1usge
See the sections below for more information about the --itrace option.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists