linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/50] 5.4.40-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYu6e9ytJejS=No4ytQT=U+YjqOPghVQXD=gAHB82L-WUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 18:52:56 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/50] 5.4.40-rc1 review

On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 18:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.40 release.
> There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 10 May 2020 12:29:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.40-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
<trim>
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>     dma-direct: exclude dma_direct_map_resource from the min_low_pfn check
While building kernel Image for arm architecture the following error noticed
on stable-rc 5.4 kernel branch.
 # make -sk KBUILD_BUILD_USER=TuxBuild -C/linux -j16 ARCH=arm
CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- HOSTCC=gcc CC="sccache
arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc" O=build zImage
 #
 ../kernel/dma/direct.c: In function ‘dma_direct_possible’:
 ../kernel/dma/direct.c:330:3: error: too many arguments to function
‘dma_capable’
   330 |   dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true);
       |   ^~~~~~~~~~~
 In file included from ../include/linux/dma-direct.h:12,
                  from ../kernel/dma/direct.c:10:
 ../arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h:17:20: note: declared here
    17 | static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t
addr, size_t size)
       |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~
 In file included from ../include/linux/init.h:5,
                  from ../include/linux/memblock.h:12,
                  from ../kernel/dma/direct.c:7:
 ../kernel/dma/direct.c: In function ‘dma_direct_map_resource’:
 ../kernel/dma/direct.c:379:16: error: too many arguments to function
‘dma_capable’
   379 |  if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, false))) {
       |                ^~~~~~~~~~~
 ../include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro ‘unlikely’
    78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
       |                                          ^
 In file included from ../include/linux/dma-direct.h:12,
                  from ../kernel/dma/direct.c:10:
 ../arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h:17:20: note: declared here
    17 | static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t
addr, size_t size)
       |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~
 make[3]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:266: kernel/dma/direct.o] Error 1
 In file included from ../include/linux/string.h:6,
                  from ../include/linux/dma-mapping.h:6,
                  from ../include/linux/dma-direct.h:5,
                  from ../kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:24:
 ../kernel/dma/swiotlb.c: In function ‘swiotlb_map’:
 ../kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:681:16: error: too many arguments to function
‘dma_capable’
   681 |  if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, *dma_addr, size, true))) {
       |                ^~~~~~~~~~~
 ../include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro ‘unlikely’
    78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
       |                                          ^
 In file included from ../include/linux/dma-direct.h:12,
                  from ../kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:24:
 ../arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h:17:20: note: declared here
    17 | static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t
addr, size_t size)
       |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~

Full build log,
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/kernel-runs/-/jobs/544288767

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org