[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfb6cb83-81c2-7491-c58b-70986119eb65@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 06:54:11 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/312] 4.4.223-rc1 review
On 5/8/20 6:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 06:37:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 5/8/20 5:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.223 release.
>>> There are 312 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sun, 10 May 2020 12:29:44 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> This is not a complete list of errors.
>
> Yeah, I knew this was going to be a rough one. I was hoping the "early
> warning" messages from Linaro would have caught most of these, oh well
> :(
>
To be fair, I had noticed the errors yesterday. I just thought this was
so bad that it looked like a stray (bad) push to me, and I didn't send
feedback. Maybe I should always send feedback if I see errors prior to
an -rc release. I don't want to spam people with noise, so I am not sure.
Any thoughts on that ?
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists