lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 08 May 2020 16:59:32 +0200
From:   Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        'Avri Altman' <Avri.Altman@....com>, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        stanley.chu@...iatek.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org,
        tomas.winkler@...el.com, cang@...eaurora.org,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, seunguk.shin@...sung.com
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [RESENT PATCH RFC v3 5/5] scsi: ufs: UFS Host Performance
 Booster(HPB) driver

On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 19:56 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> + seunguk.shin (who is one of the original author of the HPB, in case
> he has some more improvement inputs)
> 
> Hi Bean,
> I second Avri input on splitting this patch series into logical
> smaller patches, that will helps reviewers.
> Also if you can add support to build HPB as kernel module that will
> be useful. 
> I am looking into the HPB 1.0 spec, will review your patches soon.
> 
> Regards,
> Alim

Hi, Alim
that is great you added him, if he can give us more inputs,

For the HPB modulization, I did, also prefer it.
but I don't know how others think about it, since HPB is not a device
.also, I should export some properties from UFSHCD. let's see if there
are more supporters, let me try.


thanks,

Bean
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ