[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR04MB0660FB7E230C514608743560A3A20@BN6PR04MB0660.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 08:57:12 -0700
From: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] input: misc: bma150: Conditionally disable bma023
support
H Dmitry,
On 2020-05-06 9:23 p.m., Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:46:12PM -0700, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> On 2020-05-06 5:46 a.m., Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:22 PM Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The bma180 IIO driver has been extended for support for bma023.
>>>> However, this could cause conflicts with this driver. Since some
>>>> setups may depend upon the evdev setup, disable support in this
>>>> driver for the bma023 only when the IIO driver is being built.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
>>>
>>> I would just fix this with KConfig instead, like add mutually
>>> exclusive depends on these two drivers.
>>>
>>> Set this input driver as:
>>> depends on BMA180=n
>>>
>>> And the IIO driver as:
>>> depends on INPUT_BMA150=n
>>>
>>> It's a rough measure but this input driver should anyway
>>> go away.
>
> Isn't the driver handle more than bma023? I see bma150 and smb380 ID's.
> If we go Kconfig route we will be disabling it for them as well when IIO
> driver is enabled.
>
Yes, that's correct.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, sounds good to me. If I include a patch removing the input
>> driver, can I just drop this patch entirely?
>
>>
>> The only in-tree user of the input driver (based on i2c ids) is Intel
>> Mid. Not sure what the kernel policy on dropping drivers is.
>
> Do we still support this platform? I'd start there.
It looks to me like the preferred method would be to also add IIO support for
smb380/bma150, add the exclusive Kconfig entries, and leave the input
driver in place. Does this work for everyone?
>
> Thanks.
>
Thanks,
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists