[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh-Ym=onfkMyMmOZUr6cFGQUD8kMowX6OcE-A-H2efkMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 10:26:40 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 12:22 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavoars@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99 [...]
Why is this called an "efi" patch, when it doesn't appear to be so at all:
> include/linux/dma/ti-cppi5.h | 4 ++--
> include/linux/efi.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-message.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h | 4 ++--
> include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h | 2 +-
> kernel/params.c | 2 +-
> kernel/tracepoint.c | 2 +-
> scripts/kallsyms.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Yes, one line of the patch is EFI code. The rest are not.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists