lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200508045410.t7gawyklyecupe2u@cantor>
Date:   Thu, 7 May 2020 21:54:10 -0700
From:   Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
        James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] ima: Switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate

On Thu Apr 02 20, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>Hi Roberto,
>
>On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 11:47 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>> boot_aggregate is the first entry of IMA measurement list. Its purpose is
>> to link pre-boot measurements to IMA measurements. As IMA was designed to
>> work with a TPM 1.2, the SHA1 PCR bank was always selected even if a
>> TPM 2.0 with support for stronger hash algorithms is available.
>>
>> This patch first tries to find a PCR bank with the IMA default hash
>> algorithm. If it does not find it, it selects the SHA256 PCR bank for
>> TPM 2.0 and SHA1 for TPM 1.2. Ultimately, it selects SHA1 also for TPM 2.0
>> if the SHA256 PCR bank is not found.
>>
>> If none of the PCR banks above can be found, boot_aggregate file digest is
>> filled with zeros, as for TPM bypass, making it impossible to perform a
>> remote attestation of the system.
>>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.1.x
>> Fixes: 879b589210a9 ("tpm: retrieve digest size of unknown algorithms with PCR read")
>> Reported-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
>> Suggested-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>
>Thank you!  This patch set is now queued in next-integrity-testing
>during the open window.  Jerry, I assume this works for you.  Could we
>get your tag?
>
>thanks!
>
>Mimi
>

Hi Mimi,

Yes, I no longer get the errors with this patch.


Tested-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>


Regards,
Jerry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ