linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/6] exec: Move handling of the point of no return to the top level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 08 May 2020 13:47:10 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
        Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] exec: Move handling of the point of no return to the top level


Move the handing of the point of no return from search_binary_handler
into __do_execve_file so that it is easier to find, and to keep
things robust in the face of change.

Make it clear that an existing fatal signal will take precedence over
a forced SIGSEGV by not forcing SIGSEGV if a fatal signal is already
pending.  This does not change the behavior but it saves a reader
of the code the tedium of reading and understanding force_sig
and the signal delivery code.

Update the comment in begin_new_exec about where SIGSEGV is forced.

Keep point_of_no_return from being a mystery by documenting
what the code is doing where it forces SIGSEGV if the
code is past the point of no return.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
 fs/exec.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 15682a1dfee9..443eb960f9a0 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1329,8 +1329,8 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
 	/*
 	 * With the new mm installed it is completely impossible to
 	 * fail and return to the original process.  If anything from
-	 * here on returns an error, the check in
-	 * search_binary_handler() will SEGV current.
+	 * here on returns an error, the check in __do_execve_file()
+	 * will SEGV current.
 	 */
 	bprm->point_of_no_return = true;
 	bprm->mm = NULL;
@@ -1722,13 +1722,8 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 
 		read_lock(&binfmt_lock);
 		put_binfmt(fmt);
-		if (retval < 0 && bprm->point_of_no_return) {
-			/* we got to flush_old_exec() and failed after it */
-			read_unlock(&binfmt_lock);
-			force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV);
-			return retval;
-		}
-		if (retval != -ENOEXEC || !bprm->file) {
+		if (bprm->point_of_no_return || !bprm->file ||
+		    (retval != -ENOEXEC)) {
 			read_unlock(&binfmt_lock);
 			return retval;
 		}
@@ -1899,6 +1894,14 @@ static int __do_execve_file(int fd, struct filename *filename,
 	return retval;
 
 out:
+	/*
+	 * If past the point of no return ensure the the code never
+	 * returns to the userspace process.  Use an existing fatal
+	 * signal if present otherwise terminate the process with
+	 * SIGSEGV.
+	 */
+	if (bprm->point_of_no_return && !fatal_signal_pending(current))
+		force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV);
 	if (bprm->mm) {
 		acct_arg_size(bprm, 0);
 		mmput(bprm->mm);
-- 
2.20.1