[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200508192023.GS185537@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 22:20:23 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/17] spi: dw: Fix dma_slave_config used partly
uninitialized
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 04:29:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Since the TX and RX DMA-slave config structures are declared on the
> stack and only a part of their fields is initialized further in the
> prepare Tx/Rx methods, the next dmaengine_slave_config() calls may
> randomly perform an incorrect DMA channels setup depending on the
> stack initial values. Lets fix this by zeroing the config-structures
> before using them.
Already in spi/for-next.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists