linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/17] spi: dw: Cleanup generic DW DMA code namings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200508194324.GA185537@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 22:43:24 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] spi: dw: Cleanup generic DW DMA code namings

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 04:29:29PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Since from now the former Intel MID platform layer will be used
> as a generic DW SPI DMA module, lets alter the internal methods
> naming to be DMA-related instead of having the "mid_" prefix. In
> addition the DW PCI-DMA specific methods and structures should
> be named with pci-suffexes, since we'll implement the DW MMIO DMA
> specific functions and objects soon.

I think we rather leave Intel Medfield things alone.  And I think I did this already in spi/for-next in less invasive way.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko