[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0vewSiFc4rXu43_bs_A85EYx12_YuyBaU3PYJ1HszE=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 00:17:57 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] soc: ti: add k3 platforms chipid module driver
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:01 PM Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@...com> wrote:
> +static int __init k3_chipinfo_init(void)
> +{
> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> + struct device_node *node;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + u32 partno_id;
> + u32 variant;
> + u32 jtag_id;
> + u32 mfg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,am654-chipid");
> + if (!node)
> + return -ENODEV;
This will fail the initcall and print a warning when the kernel runs on any
other SoC. Would it be possible to just make this a platform_driver?
If not, I think you should silently return success when the device
node is absent.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists