[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <158890041329.32359.15170754765805199921.b4-ty@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 21:16:43 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, bvanassche@....org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
Avri.Altman@....com, Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, salyzyn@...gle.com,
hongwus@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
saravanak@...gle.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org, beanhuo@...ron.com
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] scsi: pm: Balance pm_only counter of request queue during system resume
On Tue, 5 May 2020 21:55:35 -0700, Can Guo wrote:
> During system resume, scsi_resume_device() decreases a request queue's
> pm_only counter if the scsi device was quiesced before. But after that,
> if the scsi device's RPM status is RPM_SUSPENDED, the pm_only counter is
> still held (non-zero). Current scsi resume hook only sets the RPM status
> of the scsi device and its request queue to RPM_ACTIVE, but leaves the
> pm_only counter unchanged. This may make the request queue's pm_only
> counter remain non-zero after resume hook returns, hence those who are
> waiting on the mq_freeze_wq would never be woken up. Fix this by calling
> blk_post_runtime_resume() if a sdev's RPM status was RPM_SUSPENDED.
>
> [...]
Applied to 5.7/scsi-queue, thanks!
[1/1] scsi: pm: Balance pm_only counter of request queue during system resume
https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/a3b923842626
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists