[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200508084426.GR5298@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 10:44:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 1 24/36] lockdep: Prepare for noinstr sections
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:23:39PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
> > +void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
> Would be nice to have some kerneldoc explaining the difference between
> lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare() and lockdep_hardirqs_on().
As the naming suggests, it's not a matter of difference, but of order,
first you call on_prepare(), then you call on(). The function signature
as per the above gives clue why.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists