linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/20] mips: Add MIPS Warrior P5600 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200508093259.GB9085@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 11:32:59 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...nk.ru>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Cedric Hombourger <Cedric_Hombourger@...tor.com>,
        René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/20] mips: Add MIPS Warrior P5600 support

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 12:19:23AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 01:17:35PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > P5600 is CPU_MIPS_R5 so can't you select it here and drop all the || CPU_5600
> > above/below ?
> 
> Alas, We can't do this so easy. CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_{R2,R5,R6} and any other
> CONFIG_CPU_* configs is something that kernel config-file is supposed to select.
> Their availability is enabled by the CONFIG_SYS_HAS_CPU_* configs. CONFIG_CPU_*
> is supposed to activate CPU-specific features and there is only one
> CONFIG_CPU_x can be enabled at a time seeing it's a part of the "CPU type"
> choice kconfig menu. In addition the CPU config also tunes a compiler to activate
> the arch-specific ISA and optimizations in the arch/mips/Makefile by setting
> -march=cpu-name (where cpu-name can be p5600, mips32r5, etc).
> 
> Yes, P5600 is based on the MIPS32r5, but it also has got some specific features
> (see config CPU_P5600 and config MIPS32_R5), which makes it to be different from
> the ancestor. So In addition to the difficulties described above IMHO converting
> CPU_P5600 to a set of features activated on top of the CPU_MIPS32_R5 config
> would contradict the design of the CPU-support configs implemented in the MIPS
> arch subsystem.

maybe I wasn't clear enough, my suggestion is

use 

config CPU_P5600
	bool "MIPS Warrior P5600"
	depends on SYS_HAS_CPU_P5600
	select CPU_MIPS32_R5
	select CPU_SUPPORTS_UNCACHED_ACCELERATED
	select CPU_SUPPORTS_CPUFREQ
	select CPU_MIPSR2_IRQ_VI
	select CPU_MIPSR2_IRQ_EI

That way you don't need to any "|| CPU_P5600" where CPU_MIPS32_R5 is
already there. Or are there cases, where this would be wrong ?

Thomas.


-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]