[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e2c3348-f346-e3f2-9c7c-5c4135f9b38c@web.de>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 13:03:12 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Shiyuan Hu <hushiyuan@...wei.com>,
Hewenliang <hewenliang4@...wei.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tools/bootconfig: fix resource leak in apply_xbc()
…
> +++ b/tools/bootconfig/main.c
> @@ -314,31 +314,35 @@ int apply_xbc(const char *path, const char *xbc_path)
…
> +free_data:
> free(data);
…
Would any software users prefer to omit the memory release for
a quicker program termination?
Can the commit message become clearer about the explanation for
the importance of the proposed change?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists