[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200508140209.1715118b@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 14:02:09 +0200
From: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Protect INET_ADDR_COOKIE on 32-bit architectures
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
wrote:
> From: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:52:31 +0200
>
> > This patch changes INET_ADDR_COOKIE to declare a dummy typedef (so it
> > makes checkpatch.pl complain, sorry...)
>
> This is trading one problem for another, so in the end doesn't really
> move us forward.
Right, a dummy struct is probably better, I’ll send a v2.
Regards,
Stephen
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists