lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200508140209.1715118b@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 14:02:09 +0200
From:   Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     joe@...ches.com, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Protect INET_ADDR_COOKIE on 32-bit architectures

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
wrote:
> From: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:52:31 +0200
> 
> > This patch changes INET_ADDR_COOKIE to declare a dummy typedef (so it
> > makes checkpatch.pl complain, sorry...)  
> 
> This is trading one problem for another, so in the end doesn't really
> move us forward.

Right, a dummy struct is probably better, I’ll send a v2.

Regards,

Stephen

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ